EWP | VNAM | EWP / VNAM | |
Gain YTD | 61.126 | 61.784 | 99% |
Net Assets | 1.43B | 26.2M | 5,443% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.51 | 98% |
Turnover | 15.00 | 13.16 | 114% |
Yield | 2.63 | 0.79 | 333% |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 4 years | - |
EWP | VNAM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 4 days ago75% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 4 days ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 4 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 7 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago81% | 28 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% | 4 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago89% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWP has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWP jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VNAM has been loosely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VNAM jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VNAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VNAM | 100% | -2.04% | ||
FRT - VNAM | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
HUT - VNAM | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
KOS - VNAM | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
CMG - VNAM | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
SSB - VNAM | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.16% | ||
More |