Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EWP vs VNAM
EWP vs VNAM Comparison
Open Charts EWP vs VNAM
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
Price$56.25
Change+$7.58 (+15.57%)
Volume$1.88M
Net Assets1.9B
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF
Price$24.14
Change+$0.31 (+1.30%)
Volume$21.65K
Net Assets32.68M
EWP vs VNAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWP vs. VNAM commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWP is a Buy and VNAM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWP has more net assets: 1.9B vs. VNAM (32.7M). EWP has a higher annual dividend yield than VNAM: EWP (4.341) vs VNAM (-4.016). EWP was incepted earlier than VNAM: EWP (30 years) vs VNAM (4 years). EWP (0.50) and VNAM (0.51) have comparable expense ratios . EWP has a higher turnover VNAM (22.26) vs VNAM (22.26).
| EWP | VNAM | EWP / VNAM | |
| Gain YTD | 4.341 | -4.016 | -108% |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 32.7M | 5,804% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.51 | 98% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 22.26 | 130% |
| Yield | 2.17 | 0.50 | 431% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWP | VNAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWP has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWP jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWP | 100% | -1.07% | ||
| SAN - EWP | 84% Closely correlated | -6.36% | ||
| BBVA - EWP | 83% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| FER - EWP | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| AMS - EWP | -4% Poorly correlated | -1.41% |
VNAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VNAM has been loosely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VNAM jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VNAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VNAM | 100% | -1.31% | ||
| FRT - VNAM | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| HUT - VNAM | 26% Poorly correlated | +5.06% | ||
| KOS - VNAM | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
| CMG - VNAM | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.71% | ||
| SSB - VNAM | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
More | ||||