| EWP | GF | EWP / GF | |
| Gain YTD | 69.448 | 40.040 | 173% |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 198M | 821% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.10 | 45% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 35.00 | 43% |
| Yield | 2.53 | 0.54 | 470% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 36 years | - |
| EWP | GF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 7 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 68% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWP has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWP jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that GF and LEG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GF and LEG's prices will move in lockstep.