| EWP | GF | EWP / GF | |
| Gain YTD | 2.059 | 4.378 | 47% |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 217M | 841% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.10 | 45% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 35.00 | 83% |
| Yield | 2.28 | 1.17 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 36 years | - |
| EWP | GF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 14 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWP has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWP jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that GF and LEG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GF and LEG's prices will move in lockstep.