Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EWMCX vs GFAFX
EWMCX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts EWMCX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.52B
EWMCX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWMCX vs. GFAFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWMCX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. EWMCX (513M). EWMCX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: EWMCX (0.37) vs GFAFX (0.28). EWMCX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: EWMCX (80 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). EWMCX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. EWMCX (8.55). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EWMCX: GFAFX (250) vs EWMCX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. EWMCX (3.98). EWMCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.01 vs. GFAFX (40.08).
| EWMCX | GFAFX | EWMCX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.67 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.67 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 80 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.351 | 19.672 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 513M | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.28 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.98 | 8.83 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.01 | 64.95 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.01 | 40.08 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 198.86 | 102.20 | 195% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement