EWG | VNAM | EWG / VNAM | |
Gain YTD | 32.080 | 49.807 | 64% |
Net Assets | 2.38B | 19.7M | 12,086% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.51 | 98% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 13.16 | 23% |
Yield | 1.62 | 0.79 | 206% |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 4 years | - |
EWG | VNAM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 4 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 29 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago82% | 6 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago64% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been closely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VNAM has been loosely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VNAM jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VNAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VNAM | 100% | -1.68% | ||
FRT - VNAM | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
HUT - VNAM | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
CMG - VNAM | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
VRE - VNAM | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.14% | ||
KOS - VNAM | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.65% | ||
More |