EWG | VNAM | EWG / VNAM | |
Gain YTD | 36.042 | 46.959 | 77% |
Net Assets | 2.81B | 19.3M | 14,549% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.51 | 98% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 13.16 | 23% |
Yield | 1.65 | 0.89 | 186% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 4 years | - |
EWG | VNAM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 8 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago82% | 18 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago60% | 4 days ago87% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been closely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VNAM has been loosely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VNAM jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VNAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VNAM | 100% | -0.41% | ||
FRT - VNAM | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
HUT - VNAM | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.02% | ||
VRE - VNAM | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
KOS - VNAM | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.30% | ||
CMG - VNAM | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.02% | ||
More |