EWG | MXE | EWG / MXE | |
Gain YTD | 32.208 | 42.839 | 75% |
Net Assets | 2.03B | 62.6M | 3,244% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.51 | 33% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 156.07 | 2% |
Yield | 1.63 | 2.05 | 80% |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 35 years | - |
EWG | MXE | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago82% | 5 days ago90% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 9 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been closely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that MXE and ACGP have been poorly correlated (+-11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MXE and ACGP's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MXE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MXE | 100% | -0.69% | ||
ACGP - MXE | -11% Poorly correlated | +1.09% |