EWG | KWT | EWG / KWT | |
Gain YTD | 35.530 | 23.221 | 153% |
Net Assets | 2.85B | 85.5M | 3,331% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.74 | 68% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 51.00 | 6% |
Yield | 1.60 | 3.41 | 47% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 5 years | - |
EWG | KWT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 5 days ago55% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago78% | 5 days ago54% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 5 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago88% | 5 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 5 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago79% | 5 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago82% | 9 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago82% | 7 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago79% | 5 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago85% | 5 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that KWT and CGC have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KWT and CGC's prices will move in lockstep.