EWG | KWT | EWG / KWT | |
Gain YTD | 35.147 | 18.095 | 194% |
Net Assets | 2.87B | 87.5M | 3,279% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.74 | 68% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 51.00 | 6% |
Yield | 1.81 | 5.26 | 34% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 5 years | - |
EWG | KWT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago61% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago57% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago82% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that KWT and CGC have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KWT and CGC's prices will move in lockstep.