EWG | GF | EWG / GF | |
Gain YTD | 36.776 | 56.145 | 66% |
Net Assets | 2.9B | 220M | 1,319% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.10 | 45% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 35.00 | 9% |
Yield | 1.60 | 0.50 | 323% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 36 years | - |
EWG | GF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago82% | 3 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago82% | 11 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 5 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that GF and LEG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GF and LEG's prices will move in lockstep.