EWG | GF | EWG / GF | |
Gain YTD | 31.632 | 45.883 | 69% |
Net Assets | 2.03B | 207M | 980% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.10 | 45% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 35.00 | 9% |
Yield | 1.62 | 0.52 | 314% |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 36 years | - |
EWG | GF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago82% | 13 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been closely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that GF and LEG have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GF and LEG's prices will move in lockstep.