EWG | FSZ | EWG / FSZ | |
Gain YTD | 32.080 | 26.238 | 122% |
Net Assets | 2.39B | 82M | 2,920% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.80 | 63% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 71.00 | 4% |
Yield | 1.62 | 1.63 | 100% |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
EWG | FSZ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 1 day ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 5 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 4 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been closely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSZ has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSZ jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FSZ | 100% | +0.59% | ||
ALC - FSZ | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
ROG - FSZ | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
SUN - FSZ | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
BAER - FSZ | 11% Poorly correlated | +4.10% | ||
LOGN - FSZ | -12% Poorly correlated | N/A |