EWCZ
Price
$3.96
Change
+$0.03 (+0.76%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
171.71M
32 days until earnings call
SLSN
Price
$3.31
Change
+$0.08 (+2.48%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
233.3M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EWCZ vs SLSN

Header iconEWCZ vs SLSN Comparison
Open Charts EWCZ vs SLSNBanner chart's image
European Wax Center
Price$3.96
Change+$0.03 (+0.76%)
Volume$525.26K
Capitalization171.71M
Solesence
Price$3.31
Change+$0.08 (+2.48%)
Volume$25.08K
Capitalization233.3M
EWCZ vs SLSN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EWCZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLSN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EWCZ vs. SLSN commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWCZ is a Hold and SLSN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (EWCZ: $3.96 vs. SLSN: $3.31)
Brand notoriety: EWCZ and SLSN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EWCZ: 108% vs. SLSN: 51%
Market capitalization -- EWCZ: $171.71M vs. SLSN: $233.3M
EWCZ [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $171.71M. SLSN’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $233.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $356.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $20.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EWCZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLSN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EWCZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLSN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLSN is a better buy in the long-term than EWCZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EWCZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLSN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EWCZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLSN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EWCZ is a better buy in the short-term than SLSN.

Price Growth

EWCZ (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -1.00% price change this week, while SLSN (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -4.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

EWCZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-2.09% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLSN($233M) has a higher market cap than EWCZ($172M). SLSN has higher P/E ratio than EWCZ: SLSN (41.38) vs EWCZ (19.80). SLSN YTD gains are higher at: 35.489 vs. EWCZ (-40.630). EWCZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 61.9M vs. SLSN (7.29M). EWCZ has more cash in the bank: 63.9M vs. SLSN (4.11M). SLSN has less debt than EWCZ: SLSN (26.3M) vs EWCZ (381M). EWCZ has higher revenues than SLSN: EWCZ (213M) vs SLSN (64.4M).
EWCZSLSNEWCZ / SLSN
Capitalization172M233M74%
EBITDA61.9M7.29M850%
Gain YTD-40.63035.489-114%
P/E Ratio19.8041.3848%
Revenue213M64.4M331%
Total Cash63.9M4.11M1,556%
Total Debt381M26.3M1,449%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLSN: Fundamental Ratings
SLSN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56
SMR RATING
1..100
27
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EWCZSLSN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EWCZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLSN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBMJ0.070.01
+18.64%
Conservative Broadcast Media & Journalism Inc.
AGFMF10.30N/A
N/A
AGF Management Ltd.
AKTAF1.45N/A
N/A
Akita Drilling Ltd.
KYYHF23.10N/A
N/A
Kyushu Railway Co
CAPMF139.08-0.47
-0.34%
Capgemini SE

EWCZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWCZ has been loosely correlated with IPAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWCZ jumps, then IPAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EWCZ
1D Price
Change %
EWCZ100%
+0.76%
IPAR - EWCZ
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
NWL - EWCZ
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
SPB - EWCZ
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
HIMS - EWCZ
29%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%
ELF - EWCZ
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
More

SLSN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLSN and BRRDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLSN and BRRDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLSN
1D Price
Change %
SLSN100%
+2.48%
BRRDF - SLSN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GROV - SLSN
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
EWCZ - SLSN
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
HNST - SLSN
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
SKIN - SLSN
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
More