EWCZ
Price
$3.93
Change
+$0.52 (+15.25%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
171.71M
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KBYPF
Price
$34.62
Change
-$2.81 (-7.51%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.57B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EWCZ vs KBYPF

Header iconEWCZ vs KBYPF Comparison
Open Charts EWCZ vs KBYPFBanner chart's image
European Wax Center
Price$3.93
Change+$0.52 (+15.25%)
Volume$397.13K
Capitalization171.71M
Kobayashi Pharmaceutical
Price$34.62
Change-$2.81 (-7.51%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.57B
EWCZ vs KBYPF Comparison Chart in %
EWCZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EWCZ vs. KBYPF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWCZ is a StrongBuy and KBYPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (EWCZ: $3.93 vs. KBYPF: $34.05)
Brand notoriety: EWCZ and KBYPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EWCZ: 105% vs. KBYPF: 269%
Market capitalization -- EWCZ: $171.71M vs. KBYPF: $2.57B
EWCZ [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $171.71M. KBYPF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $2.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $360.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EWCZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKBYPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EWCZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KBYPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KBYPF is a better buy in the long-term than EWCZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EWCZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EWCZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

EWCZ (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -1.50% price change this week, while KBYPF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

EWCZ is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-0.31% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KBYPF($2.58B) has a higher market cap than EWCZ($172M). KBYPF has higher P/E ratio than EWCZ: KBYPF (34.12) vs EWCZ (15.12). EWCZ YTD gains are higher at: 9.167 vs. KBYPF (-1.646). KBYPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.4B vs. EWCZ (66.6M). KBYPF has more cash in the bank: 69.7B vs. EWCZ (73.6M). EWCZ has less debt than KBYPF: EWCZ (382M) vs KBYPF (749M). KBYPF has higher revenues than EWCZ: KBYPF (161B) vs EWCZ (211M).
EWCZKBYPFEWCZ / KBYPF
Capitalization172M2.58B7%
EBITDA66.6M24.4B0%
Gain YTD9.167-1.646-557%
P/E Ratio15.1234.1244%
Revenue211M161B0%
Total Cash73.6M69.7B0%
Total Debt382M749M51%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EWCZKBYPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EWCZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRECF0.350.02
+5.55%
Critical Elements Lithium Corporation
CICOF1.73N/A
N/A
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd.
MBHCF1.00N/A
N/A
MBH Corporation PLC
MAPGF0.97N/A
N/A
Mapletree Logistics Trust Units Real Estate Investment Trust
MAOIF22.85N/A
N/A
Manitou DF

EWCZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWCZ has been loosely correlated with IPAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWCZ jumps, then IPAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EWCZ
1D Price
Change %
EWCZ100%
-3.91%
IPAR - EWCZ
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
NWL - EWCZ
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
SPB - EWCZ
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
HIMS - EWCZ
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.40%
HNST - EWCZ
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
More

KBYPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KBYPF has been loosely correlated with ETTYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KBYPF jumps, then ETTYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KBYPF
1D Price
Change %
KBYPF100%
N/A
ETTYF - KBYPF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LIOPY - KBYPF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GROV - KBYPF
12%
Poorly correlated
+3.38%
EWCZ - KBYPF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.91%
HNST - KBYPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
More