EWC | VNAM | EWC / VNAM | |
Gain YTD | 22.829 | 49.807 | 46% |
Net Assets | 3.19B | 19.7M | 16,203% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.51 | 98% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 13.16 | 30% |
Yield | 1.76 | 0.79 | 222% |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 4 years | - |
EWC | VNAM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 29 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago81% | 6 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago64% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VNAM has been loosely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VNAM jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VNAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VNAM | 100% | -1.68% | ||
FRT - VNAM | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
HUT - VNAM | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
CMG - VNAM | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
VRE - VNAM | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.14% | ||
KOS - VNAM | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.65% | ||
More |