EWC | QAT | EWC / QAT | |
Gain YTD | 13.846 | 1.506 | 919% |
Net Assets | 3.05B | 88.9M | 3,427% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.60 | 83% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 27.00 | 15% |
Yield | 2.00 | 5.67 | 35% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
EWC | QAT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 5 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with RY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then RY could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that QAT and MARK have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QAT and MARK's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QAT | 100% | -3.70% | ||
MARK - QAT | 1% Poorly correlated | +3.67% |