| EWC | GREK | EWC / GREK | |
| Gain YTD | 30.248 | 73.999 | 41% |
| Net Assets | 3.52B | 288M | 1,221% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.57 | 88% |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 24.24 | 17% |
| Yield | 1.63 | 3.90 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| EWC | GREK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 78% | 17 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 74% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 71% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that GREK and SAR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GREK and SAR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GREK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GREK | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| SAR - GREK | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.00% | ||
| HTO - GREK | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.26% | ||
| TEN - GREK | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
| PPC - GREK | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| CCEC - GREK | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
More | ||||