EWC | GREK | EWC / GREK | |
Gain YTD | 22.829 | 65.913 | 35% |
Net Assets | 3.19B | 305M | 1,047% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.57 | 88% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 24.24 | 17% |
Yield | 1.76 | 4.04 | 43% |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
EWC | GREK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago88% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 27 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago81% | 7 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that GREK and SAR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GREK and SAR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GREK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GREK | 100% | +0.22% | ||
SAR - GREK | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
HTO - GREK | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
TEN - GREK | 13% Poorly correlated | +3.69% | ||
PPC - GREK | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
CCEC - GREK | 10% Poorly correlated | +3.22% | ||
More |