EWC | GF | EWC / GF | |
Gain YTD | 17.433 | 56.145 | 31% |
Net Assets | 3.12B | 220M | 1,420% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.10 | 45% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 35.00 | 11% |
Yield | 1.85 | 0.50 | 373% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 36 years | - |
EWC | GF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago85% | 3 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago81% | 11 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 5 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 7 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with RY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then RY could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that GF and LEG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GF and LEG's prices will move in lockstep.