EWC | FLGB | EWC / FLGB | |
Gain YTD | 18.233 | 24.093 | 76% |
Net Assets | 3.1B | 825M | 376% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.09 | 556% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 10.13 | 39% |
Yield | 1.86 | 3.60 | 52% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
EWC | FLGB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 3 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago81% | 17 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLGB and NG have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLGB and NG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLGB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLGB | 100% | +0.37% | ||
NG - FLGB | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.84% | ||
RIO - FLGB | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.65% | ||
GSK - FLGB | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
VOD - FLGB | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
HLN - FLGB | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
More |