EWBC
Price
$108.93
Change
+$1.78 (+1.66%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.8B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IFS
Price
$40.52
Change
+$0.28 (+0.70%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.45B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EWBC vs IFS

Header iconEWBC vs IFS Comparison
Open Charts EWBC vs IFSBanner chart's image
East West Ban
Price$108.93
Change+$1.78 (+1.66%)
Volume$8.74K
Capitalization14.8B
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$40.52
Change+$0.28 (+0.70%)
Volume$1.81K
Capitalization4.45B
EWBC vs IFS Comparison Chart in %
EWBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EWBC vs. IFS commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWBC is a StrongBuy and IFS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (EWBC: $107.16 vs. IFS: $40.19)
Brand notoriety: EWBC and IFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EWBC: 18% vs. IFS: 36%
Market capitalization -- EWBC: $14.8B vs. IFS: $4.45B
EWBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.8B. IFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EWBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EWBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IFS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the long-term than EWBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EWBC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EWBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EWBC is a better buy in the short-term than IFS.

Price Growth

EWBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.20% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

EWBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

IFS is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWBC($14.8B) has a higher market cap than IFS($4.45B). EWBC has higher P/E ratio than IFS: EWBC (11.86) vs IFS (7.94). IFS YTD gains are higher at: 41.387 vs. EWBC (14.714). EWBC has less debt than IFS: EWBC (3.62B) vs IFS (12B). IFS has higher revenues than EWBC: IFS (6.94B) vs EWBC (2.69B).
EWBCIFSEWBC / IFS
Capitalization14.8B4.45B332%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.71441.38736%
P/E Ratio11.867.94149%
Revenue2.69B6.94B39%
Total Cash712MN/A-
Total Debt3.62B12B30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EWBC vs IFS: Fundamental Ratings
EWBC
IFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2925
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6278
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7538

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFS's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EWBC (89) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than EWBC’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as EWBC (29) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as EWBC (9) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as EWBC (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.

EWBC's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (78) in the null industry. This means that EWBC’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EWBCIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EWBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABCYX23.28N/A
N/A
American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq Y
SEEIX14.71N/A
N/A
SEI International Equity I (SIT)
WFSTX11.94N/A
N/A
Allspring Innovation Fund - Class A
CICGX10.40N/A
N/A
AB Concentrated International Growth C
GSIHX23.03N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps A

EWBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWBC has been closely correlated with WBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWBC jumps, then WBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EWBC
1D Price
Change %
EWBC100%
-0.35%
WBS - EWBC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
FNB - EWBC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
ASB - EWBC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
WTFC - EWBC
89%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
CFG - EWBC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
More

IFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFS
1D Price
Change %
IFS100%
+0.29%
BAP - IFS
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
BSAC - IFS
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
BCH - IFS
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
INTR - IFS
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
EWBC - IFS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
More