It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EWBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFXNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EWBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FXNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
EWBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.80% price change this week, while FXNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.
EWBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.
FXNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
EWBC | FXNC | EWBC / FXNC | |
Capitalization | 11.1B | 102M | 10,882% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -18.668 | -18.652 | 100% |
P/E Ratio | 9.54 | 10.59 | 90% |
Revenue | 2.56B | 55.8M | 4,595% |
Total Cash | 445M | 17.2M | 2,587% |
Total Debt | 4.76B | 14.3M | 33,252% |
EWBC | FXNC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FXNC's Valuation (51) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EWBC (89). This means that FXNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than EWBC’s over the last 12 months.
EWBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FXNC (51). This means that EWBC’s stock grew similarly to FXNC’s over the last 12 months.
EWBC's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FXNC (55). This means that EWBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FXNC’s over the last 12 months.
FXNC's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EWBC (63). This means that FXNC’s stock grew similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.
FXNC's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EWBC (38). This means that FXNC’s stock grew similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.
EWBC | FXNC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago41% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago66% | 4 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | 4 days ago52% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago63% | 4 days ago57% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 4 days ago56% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago68% | 4 days ago55% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago67% | 6 days ago55% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago50% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago66% | 4 days ago43% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWBC has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWBC jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWBC | 100% | +2.02% | ||
WTFC - EWBC | 90% Closely correlated | +0.89% | ||
PNFP - EWBC | 89% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
ASB - EWBC | 88% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
FNB - EWBC | 88% Closely correlated | +3.11% | ||
HWC - EWBC | 88% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FXNC has been loosely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FXNC jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FXNC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FXNC | 100% | N/A | ||
SNV - FXNC | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.90% | ||
PNC - FXNC | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
ONB - FXNC | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
CFG - FXNC | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
EWBC - FXNC | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.02% | ||
More |