EWA | VNAM | EWA / VNAM | |
Gain YTD | 12.682 | 36.177 | 35% |
Net Assets | 1.57B | 17.9M | 8,749% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.51 | 98% |
Turnover | 5.00 | 13.16 | 38% |
Yield | 3.09 | 1.02 | 302% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 4 years | - |
EWA | VNAM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 5 days ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago83% | 6 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 8 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNAM and CMG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNAM and CMG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VNAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VNAM | 100% | +2.02% | ||
CMG - VNAM | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
FTS - VNAM | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
HUT - VNAM | 14% Poorly correlated | -3.60% | ||
VHC - VNAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -4.10% | ||
VRE - VNAM | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |