EWA | KWT | EWA / KWT | |
Gain YTD | 12.214 | 23.221 | 53% |
Net Assets | 1.61B | 85.5M | 1,880% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.74 | 68% |
Turnover | 5.00 | 51.00 | 10% |
Yield | 3.09 | 3.41 | 91% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 5 years | - |
EWA | KWT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago86% | 5 days ago55% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago84% | 5 days ago54% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 5 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago75% | 5 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago83% | 5 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago80% | 5 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago83% | 9 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago83% | 7 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago81% | 5 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that KWT and CGC have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KWT and CGC's prices will move in lockstep.