EWA | KWT | EWA / KWT | |
Gain YTD | 11.022 | 18.095 | 61% |
Net Assets | 1.59B | 87.5M | 1,811% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.74 | 68% |
Turnover | 5.00 | 51.00 | 10% |
Yield | 3.43 | 5.26 | 65% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 5 years | - |
EWA | KWT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago61% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago57% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago84% | 3 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that KWT and CGC have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KWT and CGC's prices will move in lockstep.