EWA | FLSW | EWA / FLSW | |
Gain YTD | 11.575 | 20.556 | 56% |
Net Assets | 1.57B | 53.3M | 2,938% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.09 | 556% |
Turnover | 5.00 | 10.82 | 46% |
Yield | 3.09 | 2.22 | 139% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
EWA | FLSW | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago86% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago83% | 7 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 2 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 7 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLSW has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLSW jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLSW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLSW | 100% | -1.60% | ||
ALC - FLSW | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
BAER - FLSW | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
LOGN - FLSW | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CFR - FLSW | -5% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
ROG - FLSW | -9% Poorly correlated | +1.33% |