EWA | FLMX | EWA / FLMX | |
Gain YTD | 12.682 | 34.544 | 37% |
Net Assets | 1.61B | 57.1M | 2,818% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.19 | 263% |
Turnover | 5.00 | 9.92 | 50% |
Yield | 3.09 | 4.16 | 74% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
EWA | FLMX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago79% | 5 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 5 days ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 5 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago76% | 5 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago83% | 5 days ago88% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago80% | 5 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago83% | 5 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 21 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago86% | 5 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago79% | 5 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLMX and OMAB have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLMX and OMAB's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLMX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLMX | 100% | +0.44% | ||
OMAB - FLMX | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
AC - FLMX | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.19% |