EWA | EWL | EWA / EWL | |
Gain YTD | 10.310 | 20.148 | 51% |
Net Assets | 1.56B | 1.32B | 118% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 100% |
Turnover | 5.00 | 6.00 | 83% |
Yield | 3.43 | 1.84 | 186% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 29 years | - |
EWA | EWL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% | 4 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago84% | 28 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 26 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWL has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWL jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWL | 100% | -1.87% | ||
ALC - EWL | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.28% | ||
CFR - EWL | 14% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
ROG - EWL | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.97% | ||
BAER - EWL | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.72% | ||
LOGN - EWL | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A |