Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVUAX vs FKUTX
EVUAX vs FKUTX Comparison
Open Charts EVUAX vs FKUTX
Allspring Util and Telecomms A
Price$20.29
Change-$1.64 (-7.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets348.78M
EVUAX vs FKUTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVUAX vs. FKUTX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVUAX is a Hold and FKUTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKUTX has more cash in the bank: 7.18B vs. EVUAX (349M). FKUTX pays higher dividends than EVUAX: FKUTX (2.17) vs EVUAX (1.65). EVUAX was incepted earlier than FKUTX: EVUAX (32 years) vs FKUTX (77 years). EVUAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FKUTX (0.71). EVUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. FKUTX (6.80). EVUAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FKUTX (4%) vs FKUTX (4%). EVUAX (1000) and FKUTX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FKUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.43 vs. EVUAX (7.48). FKUTX return over 5 years is better than : 38.57 vs. EVUAX (4.53).
| EVUAX | FKUTX | EVUAX / FKUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.71 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.71 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 77 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.298 | 2.720 | 48% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 153% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 349M | 7.18B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 2.17 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.48 | 10.43 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.81 | 25.65 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.53 | 38.57 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.84 | 70.36 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement