EVTZF
Price
$8.44
Change
-$0.30 (-3.43%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Capitalization
778.95M
FKWL
Price
$4.95
Change
-$0.04 (-0.80%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
35.23M
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EVTZF vs FKWL

Header iconEVTZF vs FKWL Comparison
Open Charts EVTZF vs FKWLBanner chart's image
Evertz Technologies
Price$8.44
Change-$0.30 (-3.43%)
Volume$118
Capitalization778.95M
Franklin Wireless
Price$4.95
Change-$0.04 (-0.80%)
Volume$23.48K
Capitalization35.23M
EVTZF vs FKWL Comparison Chart
Loading...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EVTZF vs. FKWL commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVTZF is a Hold and FKWL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (EVTZF: $8.44 vs. FKWL: $4.95)
Brand notoriety: EVTZF and FKWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EVTZF: 56% vs. FKWL: 112%
Market capitalization -- EVTZF: $778.95M vs. FKWL: $35.23M
EVTZF [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $778.95M. FKWL’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $35.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EVTZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFKWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EVTZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FKWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EVTZF is a better buy in the long-term than FKWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKWL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FKWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

EVTZF (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FKWL (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +0.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

FKWL is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-1.17% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EVTZF($779M) has a higher market cap than FKWL($35.2M). FKWL has higher P/E ratio than EVTZF: FKWL (24.15) vs EVTZF (15.82). FKWL YTD gains are higher at: 1.020 vs. EVTZF (0.000). EVTZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 108M vs. FKWL (-1.17M). FKWL has more cash in the bank: 32.7M vs. EVTZF (12.5M). FKWL has less debt than EVTZF: FKWL (0) vs EVTZF (28.8M). EVTZF has higher revenues than FKWL: EVTZF (455M) vs FKWL (47.4M).
EVTZFFKWLEVTZF / FKWL
Capitalization779M35.2M2,213%
EBITDA108M-1.17M-9,245%
Gain YTD0.0001.020-
P/E Ratio15.8224.1566%
Revenue455M47.4M960%
Total Cash12.5M32.7M38%
Total Debt28.8M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EVTZF vs FKWL: Fundamental Ratings
EVTZF
FKWL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3879
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
4292
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7438
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
464
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EVTZF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKWL (53). This means that EVTZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as EVTZF (100). This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to EVTZF’s over the last 12 months.

EVTZF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKWL (92). This means that EVTZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EVTZF (74). This means that FKWL’s stock grew somewhat faster than EVTZF’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EVTZF (46). This means that FKWL’s stock grew somewhat faster than EVTZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X104462.0400004705.133000
+4.72%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA426.5012.68
+3.06%
Tesla
SPY597.585.94
+1.00%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.981.72
+0.75%
Apple
GME27.51-0.21
-0.76%
GameStop Corp

EVTZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EVTZF and FKWL have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EVTZF and FKWL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EVTZF
1D Price
Change %
EVTZF100%
N/A
FKWL - EVTZF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
KPIFF - EVTZF
7%
Poorly correlated
+11.86%
ERIXF - EVTZF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYSNF - EVTZF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
MFCO - EVTZF
3%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
More

FKWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKWL and ZBRA have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKWL and ZBRA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKWL
1D Price
Change %
FKWL100%
-0.80%
ZBRA - FKWL
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
CSCO - FKWL
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
INFN - FKWL
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
CLFD - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
ADTN - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
More