EVR
Price
$312.92
Change
-$4.75 (-1.50%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
12.08B
48 days until earnings call
MC
Price
$70.27
Change
-$0.94 (-1.32%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.21B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EVR vs MC

Header iconEVR vs MC Comparison
Open Charts EVR vs MCBanner chart's image
Evercore
Price$312.92
Change-$4.75 (-1.50%)
Volume$451.44K
Capitalization12.08B
Moelis & Company
Price$70.27
Change-$0.94 (-1.32%)
Volume$654.24K
Capitalization5.21B
EVR vs MC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EVR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EVR vs. MC commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVR is a Buy and MC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (EVR: $312.92 vs. MC: $70.27)
Brand notoriety: EVR and MC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EVR: 89% vs. MC: 87%
Market capitalization -- EVR: $12.08B vs. MC: $5.21B
EVR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $12.08B. MC’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $5.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EVR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EVR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the long-term than EVR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EVR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EVR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EVR and MC are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EVR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.25% price change this week, while MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

EVR is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

MC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.90% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EVR($12.1B) has a higher market cap than MC($5.21B). EVR (28.34) and MC (27.45) have similar P/E ratio . EVR YTD gains are higher at: 13.970 vs. MC (-1.984). MC has less debt than EVR: MC (219M) vs EVR (930M).
EVRMCEVR / MC
Capitalization12.1B5.21B232%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.970-1.984-704%
P/E Ratio28.3427.45103%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A61.5M-
Total Debt930M219M425%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EVR vs MC: Fundamental Ratings
EVR
MC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6668
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2631
SMR RATING
1..100
3521
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for EVR (97). This means that MC’s stock grew significantly faster than EVR’s over the last 12 months.

EVR's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (31). This means that EVR’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

MC's SMR Rating (21) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as EVR (35). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to EVR’s over the last 12 months.

EVR's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (46). This means that EVR’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

EVR's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MC (100). This means that EVR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EVRMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EVR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MINO44.130.08
+0.18%
PIMCO Muncpl Income Oppos Act Ex-Trd
EUDV51.57N/A
N/A
ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Gr ETF
IAE7.19-0.03
-0.42%
VOYA ASIA PACIFIC HIGH DIVIDEND EQUITY Income FUND
BCI21.15-0.09
-0.42%
abrdn Blmb AllCmdStrK1Fr ETF
NFXS13.75-0.10
-0.70%
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares

EVR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVR has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EVR jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EVR
1D Price
Change %
EVR100%
-1.50%
PIPR - EVR
90%
Closely correlated
-1.97%
MC - EVR
90%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
SF - EVR
88%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
GS - EVR
88%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
LAZ - EVR
87%
Closely correlated
-2.47%
More