It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EVR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHGBL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EVR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HGBL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
EVR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.23% price change this week, while HGBL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -10.49% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.95%.
EVR is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
HGBL is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2026.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| EVR | HGBL | EVR / HGBL | |
| Capitalization | 11.9B | 44.1M | 26,984% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 10.2M | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.672 | -29.730 | -39% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.37 | 15.88 | 154% |
| Revenue | 3.24B | 48.9M | 6,622% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 19.8M | - |
| Total Debt | 930M | 6.21M | 14,978% |
EVR | HGBL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HGBL's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as EVR (92) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HGBL’s stock grew similarly to EVR’s over the last 12 months.
EVR's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for HGBL (100) in the null industry. This means that EVR’s stock grew significantly faster than HGBL’s over the last 12 months.
EVR's SMR Rating (35) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGBL (83) in the null industry. This means that EVR’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGBL’s over the last 12 months.
EVR's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGBL (88) in the null industry. This means that EVR’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGBL’s over the last 12 months.
HGBL's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EVR (86) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HGBL’s stock grew significantly faster than EVR’s over the last 12 months.
| EVR | HGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 10 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 60% | 8 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 3 days ago 86% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HYGV | 40.57 | -0.16 | -0.39% |
| FlexShares HY Val-Scrd Bd | |||
| SAGP | 33.75 | -0.45 | -1.31% |
| Strategas Global Policy Opp ETF | |||
| DUBS | 37.03 | -0.68 | -1.82% |
| Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | |||
| LFSC | 33.33 | -1.51 | -4.35% |
| F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF | |||
| OOSB | 15.13 | -0.82 | -5.15% |
| One+One S&P 500 and Bitcoin ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVR has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EVR jumps, then MC could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that HGBL and GS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGBL and GS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HGBL | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| GS - HGBL | 28% Poorly correlated | +3.54% | ||
| MS - HGBL | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.05% | ||
| EVR - HGBL | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.99% | ||
| NMR - HGBL | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.22% | ||
| LPLA - HGBL | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||