Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVIFX vs RLBFX
EVIFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts EVIFX vs RLBFX
Eaton Vance Balanced A
Price$12.70
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.57
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.04B
EVIFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVIFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVIFX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. EVIFX (1.08B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than EVIFX: RLBFX (2.05) vs EVIFX (1.20). EVIFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: EVIFX (94 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). EVIFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. EVIFX (5.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVIFX: RLBFX (250) vs EVIFX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.42 vs. EVIFX (4.56). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.33 vs. EVIFX (32.10).
| EVIFX | RLBFX | EVIFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Fund Existence | 94 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.498 | 13.390 | 63% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 262B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 2.05 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.56 | 8.42 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.44 | 52.65 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.10 | 46.33 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.48 | 86.14 | 88% |