Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs TRCLX
EVCGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs TRCLX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$18.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.18
Change+$0.06 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.47M
EVCGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. TRCLX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Buy and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 62.5M vs. EVCGX (42.4M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: EVCGX (1.67) vs TRCLX (1.36). EVCGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: EVCGX (33 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than EVCGX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. EVCGX (48.00). EVCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: EVCGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.77 vs. EVCGX (24.04). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.47 vs. EVCGX (-32.58).
| EVCGX | TRCLX | EVCGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.03 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.243 | 34.280 | 74% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 62.5M | 68% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.36 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.04 | 33.77 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.22 | 28.39 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.58 | -6.47 | 504% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement