Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs TRCLX
EVCGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs TRCLX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$17.92
Change-$1.46 (-7.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.16M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.57
Change+$1.40 (+9.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
EVCGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. TRCLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.9M vs. EVCGX (42.2M). EVCGX (1.54) and TRCLX (1.49) have matching dividends . EVCGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: EVCGX (33 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). EVCGX (1.96) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (1.73). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. EVCGX (48.00). EVCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: EVCGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.04 vs. EVCGX (23.59). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -9.00 vs. EVCGX (-40.28).
| EVCGX | TRCLX | EVCGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.03 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.73 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.392 | 10.035 | 4% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 66.9M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 1.49 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.59 | 50.04 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.59 | 28.71 | -19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.28 | -9.00 | 447% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement