Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKTX
EVCGX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKTX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$18.82
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.5M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$53.35
Change-$0.30 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
EVCGX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKTX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Hold and FHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. EVCGX (45.5M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: EVCGX (1.58) vs FHKTX (0.78). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKTX (17 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). EVCGX initial investment is less costly to investors than FHKTX (4%) vs FHKTX (4%). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKTX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). FHKTX (34.46) and EVCGX (33.33) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 7.93 vs. EVCGX (-29.20).
| EVCGX | FHKTX | EVCGX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.43 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.43 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.876 | 40.999 | 75% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5M | 1.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.78 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.33 | 34.46 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.15 | 101.03 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.20 | 7.93 | -368% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.82 | 86.79 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement