Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKIX
EVCGX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKIX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$18.68
Change-$0.10 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$58.01
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
EVCGX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKIX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Hold and FHKIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. EVCGX (41M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than EVCGX: FHKIX (1.84) vs EVCGX (1.58). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKIX (18 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKIX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.22 vs. EVCGX (35.95). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.28 vs. EVCGX (-36.17).
| EVCGX | FHKIX | EVCGX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.90 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.90 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.650 | 7.480 | 62% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41M | 1.79B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.84 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.95 | 57.22 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.14 | 66.65 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.17 | 4.28 | -844% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.78 | 191.08 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement