Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKIX
EVCGX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKIX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$17.87
Change+$0.09 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.09M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$47.49
Change+$0.15 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
EVCGX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKIX commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Buy and FHKIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. EVCGX (41.1M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: EVCGX (1.80) vs FHKIX (1.21). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKIX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). EVCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.50 vs. FHKIX (30.35). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 1.43 vs. EVCGX (-31.92).
| EVCGX | FHKIX | EVCGX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.90 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.90 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.270 | 22.706 | 107% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 1.31B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.21 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.50 | 30.35 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.26 | 50.59 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.92 | 1.43 | -2,225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.90 | 95.95 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement