Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKIX
EVCGX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKIX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$19.32
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$55.44
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
EVCGX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Hold and FHKIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. EVCGX (43.7M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: EVCGX (1.64) vs FHKIX (1.00). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKIX (18 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKIX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.76 vs. EVCGX (38.21). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 6.80 vs. EVCGX (-32.56).
| EVCGX | FHKIX | EVCGX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.90 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.90 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.353 | 43.624 | 79% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 1.81B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 1.00 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.21 | 40.76 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.85 | 93.48 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.56 | 6.80 | -479% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.16 | 99.42 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement