Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKIX
EVCGX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKIX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$18.44
Change-$0.15 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$53.79
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
EVCGX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Hold and FHKIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. EVCGX (42.4M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: EVCGX (1.67) vs FHKIX (1.04). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKIX (18 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKIX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.01 vs. EVCGX (35.00). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 1.18 vs. EVCGX (-36.22).
| EVCGX | FHKIX | EVCGX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.90 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.90 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.042 | 39.710 | 76% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 1.74B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.04 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.00 | 39.01 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.86 | 70.31 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.22 | 1.18 | -3,068% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.29 | 120.59 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement