Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKCX
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$18.44
Change-$0.15 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
Fidelity China Region
Price$54.22
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. EVCGX (42.4M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: EVCGX (1.67) vs FHKCX (1.00). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKCX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.03 vs. EVCGX (35.00). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.28 vs. EVCGX (-36.22).
| EVCGX | FHKCX | EVCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.91 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.91 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.042 | 39.702 | 76% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 1.74B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.00 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.00 | 39.03 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.86 | 70.29 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.22 | 1.28 | -2,835% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.29 | 120.91 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement