Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKCX
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$18.82
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.5M
Fidelity China Region
Price$54.75
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. EVCGX (45.5M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: EVCGX (1.58) vs FHKCX (0.98). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKCX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.17 vs. EVCGX (33.33). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.29 vs. EVCGX (-29.20).
| EVCGX | FHKCX | EVCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.91 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.91 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.876 | 41.579 | 74% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5M | 1.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.98 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.33 | 35.17 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.15 | 104.26 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.20 | 11.29 | -259% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.82 | 92.82 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement