Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKCX
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$17.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.09M
Fidelity China Region
Price$48.35
Change+$0.16 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Buy and FHKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. EVCGX (41.1M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: EVCGX (1.80) vs FHKCX (1.17). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKCX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). EVCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.26 vs. FHKCX (32.85). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.34 vs. EVCGX (-31.77).
| EVCGX | FHKCX | EVCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.91 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.91 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.435 | 24.325 | 96% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 1.31B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.17 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.26 | 32.85 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.05 | 48.76 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.77 | 4.34 | -733% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.22 | 68.93 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers