Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKCX
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$18.50
Change+$0.33 (+1.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.61M
Fidelity China Region
Price$50.38
Change+$0.68 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Buy and FHKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. EVCGX (42.6M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: EVCGX (1.70) vs FHKCX (1.11). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKCX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). EVCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.14 vs. FHKCX (44.31). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.09 vs. EVCGX (-28.78).
| EVCGX | FHKCX | EVCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.91 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.91 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.651 | 27.796 | 103% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.6M | 1.39B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.11 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.14 | 44.31 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.14 | 58.81 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.78 | 6.09 | -472% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.35 | 92.26 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement