Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKCX
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$18.68
Change-$0.10 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05M
Fidelity China Region
Price$58.52
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
EVCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. EVCGX (41M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than EVCGX: FHKCX (1.75) vs EVCGX (1.58). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKCX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.20 vs. EVCGX (35.95). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.35 vs. EVCGX (-36.17).
| EVCGX | FHKCX | EVCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.91 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.91 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.650 | 7.489 | 62% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41M | 1.79B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.75 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.95 | 57.20 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.14 | 66.62 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.17 | 4.35 | -831% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.78 | 191.39 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement