Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKAX
EVCGX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKAX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$18.82
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.5M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$53.89
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
EVCGX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Hold and FHKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. EVCGX (45.5M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: EVCGX (1.58) vs FHKAX (0.86). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX initial investment is less costly to investors than EVCGX (5%) vs EVCGX (5%). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKAX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). FHKAX (34.83) and EVCGX (33.33) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.51 vs. EVCGX (-29.20).
| EVCGX | FHKAX | EVCGX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.18 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.18 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.876 | 41.293 | 75% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5M | 1.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.86 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.33 | 34.83 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.15 | 102.61 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.20 | 9.51 | -307% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.82 | 89.42 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement