Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FHKAX
EVCGX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FHKAX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$18.68
Change-$0.10 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$57.65
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
EVCGX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FHKAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Hold and FHKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. EVCGX (41M). FHKAX (1.59) and EVCGX (1.58) have matching dividends . EVCGX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FHKAX (18 years). EVCGX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX initial investment is less costly to investors than EVCGX (5%) vs EVCGX (5%). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FHKAX (0) vs EVCGX (1000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.77 vs. EVCGX (35.95). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.73 vs. EVCGX (-36.17).
| EVCGX | FHKAX | EVCGX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.18 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.18 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.650 | 7.470 | 62% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41M | 1.79B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.59 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.95 | 56.77 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.14 | 65.25 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.17 | 2.73 | -1,326% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.78 | 185.89 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement