Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVCGX vs FCHKX
EVCGX vs FCHKX Comparison
Open Charts EVCGX vs FCHKX
Eaton Vance China Equity A
Price$17.92
Change-$1.46 (-7.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.16M
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$56.74
Change+$4.13 (+7.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
EVCGX vs FCHKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVCGX vs. FCHKX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVCGX is a Hold and FCHKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. EVCGX (42.2M). EVCGX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: EVCGX (1.54) vs FCHKX (0.79). EVCGX was incepted earlier than FCHKX: EVCGX (33 years) vs FCHKX (18 years). EVCGX (1.96) and FCHKX (1.92) have similar cost to investors . EVCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than EVCGX: FCHKX (250) vs EVCGX (1000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.38 vs. EVCGX (23.59). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : -3.52 vs. EVCGX (-40.28).
| EVCGX | FCHKX | EVCGX / FCHKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.92 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.92 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.392 | 10.820 | 4% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 2.07B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 0.79 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.59 | 55.38 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.59 | 67.02 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.28 | -3.52 | 1,144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.74 | 185.07 | 7% |