EVAHF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
673.7K
KSIOF
Price
$3.97
Change
+$0.05 (+1.28%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
380.92M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EVAHF vs KSIOF

Header iconEVAHF vs KSIOF Comparison
Open Charts EVAHF vs KSIOFBanner chart's image
EGF THERAMED HEALTH
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$192
Capitalization673.7K
kneat.com
Price$3.97
Change+$0.05 (+1.28%)
Volume$3.17K
Capitalization380.92M
EVAHF vs KSIOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EVAHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KSIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EVAHF vs. KSIOF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVAHF is a Buy and KSIOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EVAHF: $0.07 vs. KSIOF: $3.97)
Brand notoriety: EVAHF and KSIOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EVAHF: 45% vs. KSIOF: 32%
Market capitalization -- EVAHF: $673.7K vs. KSIOF: $380.92M
EVAHF [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $673.7K. KSIOF’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $380.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $44.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EVAHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKSIOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EVAHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KSIOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KSIOF is a better buy in the long-term than EVAHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EVAHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KSIOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EVAHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • KSIOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KSIOF is a better buy in the short-term than EVAHF.

Price Growth

EVAHF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а +9.21% price change this week, while KSIOF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was +0.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (-2.30% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KSIOF($381M) has a higher market cap than EVAHF($674K). KSIOF YTD gains are higher at: -2.931 vs. EVAHF (-36.438). KSIOF has more cash in the bank: 66.8M vs. EVAHF (24K). EVAHF has less debt than KSIOF: EVAHF (1.51M) vs KSIOF (30.7M).
EVAHFKSIOFEVAHF / KSIOF
Capitalization674K381M0%
EBITDAN/A16M-
Gain YTD-36.438-2.9311,243%
P/E RatioN/A548.19-
RevenueN/A56.6M-
Total Cash24K66.8M0%
Total Debt1.51M30.7M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EVAHF vs KSIOF: Fundamental Ratings
EVAHF
KSIOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
353
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10046
SMR RATING
1..100
10091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4064
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10053
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EVAHF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KSIOF (97). This means that EVAHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KSIOF’s over the last 12 months.

KSIOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EVAHF (100). This means that KSIOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EVAHF’s over the last 12 months.

KSIOF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as EVAHF (100). This means that KSIOF’s stock grew similarly to EVAHF’s over the last 12 months.

EVAHF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as KSIOF (64). This means that EVAHF’s stock grew similarly to KSIOF’s over the last 12 months.

KSIOF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EVAHF (100). This means that KSIOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EVAHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EVAHFKSIOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EVAHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KSIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDYA27.161.33
+5.15%
IDEAYA Biosciences
KIDS20.910.20
+0.97%
OrthoPediatrics Corp
EDAP2.52N/A
N/A
EDAP TMS SA
WWD242.85-1.74
-0.71%
Woodward
SBFM1.36-0.08
-5.24%
Sunshine Biopharma Inc

EVAHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVAHF has been loosely correlated with VS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EVAHF jumps, then VS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EVAHF
1D Price
Change %
EVAHF100%
+9.21%
VS - EVAHF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
ARQQ - EVAHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
ADBE - EVAHF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
AUID - EVAHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
ROWKF - EVAHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+12.50%
More

KSIOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KSIOF and FHGDF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KSIOF and FHGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSIOF
1D Price
Change %
KSIOF100%
+1.25%
FHGDF - KSIOF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMZNF - KSIOF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVAHF - KSIOF
7%
Poorly correlated
+9.21%
ELCO - KSIOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBSFF - KSIOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More