EUTLF
Price
$2.39
Change
-$0.19 (-7.36%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.48B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MFCO
Price
$0.39
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
994.2K
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EUTLF vs MFCO

Header iconEUTLF vs MFCO Comparison
Open Charts EUTLF vs MFCOBanner chart's image
Eutelsat Communications
Price$2.39
Change-$0.19 (-7.36%)
Volume$21.49K
Capitalization1.48B
Microwave Filter
Price$0.39
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.01K
Capitalization994.2K
EUTLF vs MFCO Comparison Chart in %
EUTLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EUTLF vs. MFCO commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EUTLF is a Hold and MFCO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (EUTLF: $2.47 vs. MFCO: $0.39)
Brand notoriety: EUTLF and MFCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EUTLF: 203% vs. MFCO: 8%
Market capitalization -- EUTLF: $1.48B vs. MFCO: $994.2K
EUTLF [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $1.48B. MFCO’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $994.2K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $307.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $9.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EUTLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EUTLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFCO is a better buy in the long-term than EUTLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EUTLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFCO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EUTLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MFCO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFCO is a better buy in the short-term than EUTLF.

Price Growth

EUTLF (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -25.83% price change this week, while MFCO (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+0.89% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EUTLF($1.48B) has a higher market cap than MFCO($994K). MFCO has higher P/E ratio than EUTLF: MFCO (13.38) vs EUTLF (7.79). MFCO YTD gains are higher at: 16.970 vs. EUTLF (9.827). EUTLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 600M vs. MFCO (196K). MFCO has less debt than EUTLF: MFCO (232K) vs EUTLF (3.17B). EUTLF has higher revenues than MFCO: EUTLF (1.24B) vs MFCO (3.76M).
EUTLFMFCOEUTLF / MFCO
Capitalization1.48B994K148,592%
EBITDA600M196K306,122%
Gain YTD9.82716.97058%
P/E Ratio7.7913.3858%
Revenue1.24B3.76M33,050%
Total Cash575MN/A-
Total Debt3.17B232K1,364,655%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EUTLF vs MFCO: Fundamental Ratings
EUTLF
MFCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9764
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9178
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3718
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2865

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EUTLF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFCO (45). This means that EUTLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFCO’s over the last 12 months.

EUTLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MFCO (100). This means that EUTLF’s stock grew similarly to MFCO’s over the last 12 months.

MFCO's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EUTLF (97). This means that MFCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than EUTLF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCO's Price Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as EUTLF (91). This means that MFCO’s stock grew similarly to EUTLF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCO's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as EUTLF (37). This means that MFCO’s stock grew similarly to EUTLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EUTLFMFCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
39%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EUTLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMAAX17.21N/A
N/A
Gabelli Entpr Mergers & Acquisitions A
MGOYX13.87N/A
N/A
Victory Mid-Cap Core Growth Y
DFIVX27.97N/A
N/A
DFA International Value I
PSBMX29.30N/A
N/A
Principal SmallCap R3
JRBFX30.37N/A
N/A
JHancock Regional Bank I

EUTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EUTLF and ETCMY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EUTLF and ETCMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EUTLF
1D Price
Change %
EUTLF100%
N/A
ETCMY - EUTLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYSNF - EUTLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFCO - EUTLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERIXF - EUTLF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVTZF - EUTLF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MFCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFCO and FKWL have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFCO and FKWL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFCO
1D Price
Change %
MFCO100%
N/A
FKWL - MFCO
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
KPIFF - MFCO
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYSNF - MFCO
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUTLF - MFCO
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERIXF - MFCO
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More