EUSHY
Price
$2.90
Change
-$0.36 (-11.04%)
Updated
Apr 21 closing price
Capitalization
311.43M
LBLCF
Price
$41.01
Change
-$0.19 (-0.46%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
48.72B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EUSHY vs LBLCF

Header iconEUSHY vs LBLCF Comparison
Open Charts EUSHY vs LBLCFBanner chart's image
Eurocash SA
Price$2.90
Change-$0.36 (-11.04%)
Volume$200
Capitalization311.43M
Loblaw Companies
Price$41.01
Change-$0.19 (-0.46%)
Volume$3.23K
Capitalization48.72B
EUSHY vs LBLCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LBLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EUSHY vs. LBLCF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EUSHY is a Hold and LBLCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (EUSHY: $2.90 vs. LBLCF: $41.01)
Brand notoriety: EUSHY and LBLCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EUSHY: 100% vs. LBLCF: 7%
Market capitalization -- EUSHY: $311.43M vs. LBLCF: $48.72B
EUSHY [@Food Retail] is valued at $311.43M. LBLCF’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $48.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $48.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EUSHY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLBLCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EUSHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LBLCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LBLCF is a better buy in the long-term than EUSHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LBLCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LBLCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

EUSHY (@Food Retail) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LBLCF (@Food Retail) price change was +0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.76%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (+0.21% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBLCF($48.7B) has a higher market cap than EUSHY($311M). EUSHY has higher P/E ratio than LBLCF: EUSHY (30.18) vs LBLCF (28.04). LBLCF YTD gains are higher at: 24.842 vs. EUSHY (-12.412).
EUSHYLBLCFEUSHY / LBLCF
Capitalization311M48.7B1%
EBITDA992MN/A-
Gain YTD-12.41224.842-50%
P/E Ratio30.1828.04108%
Revenue32.2BN/A-
Total Cash507MN/A-
Total Debt2.81BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EUSHY vs LBLCF: Fundamental Ratings
EUSHY
LBLCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1002
SMR RATING
1..100
9242
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6642
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EUSHY's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LBLCF (92). This means that EUSHY’s stock grew significantly faster than LBLCF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EUSHY (100). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew significantly faster than EUSHY’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EUSHY (92). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EUSHY’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as EUSHY (75). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to EUSHY’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as EUSHY (66). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to EUSHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EUSHYLBLCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LBLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMVYX9.820.02
+0.19%
MassMutual Small Company Val Svc
HCMIX32.52-0.03
-0.09%
HCM Tactical Plus I
OAKLX83.44-0.25
-0.30%
Oakmark Select Investor
FAIVX25.86-0.11
-0.42%
Fidelity Advisor Equity Value I
PEICX22.60-0.10
-0.44%
PGIM Jennison Value C

EUSHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EUSHY and JSAIY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EUSHY and JSAIY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EUSHY
1D Price
Change %
EUSHY100%
N/A
JSAIY - EUSHY
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.36%
EMLAF - EUSHY
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
LBLCF - EUSHY
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
NNWWF - EUSHY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSNSF - EUSHY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LBLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBLCF and OCDGF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBLCF and OCDGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBLCF
1D Price
Change %
LBLCF100%
-0.47%
OCDGF - LBLCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRRFY - LBLCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OCDDY - LBLCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
KKOYF - LBLCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNGRF - LBLCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More