It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EULIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLTRBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EULIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LTRBF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
EULIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +20.57% price change this week, while LTRBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
EULIF | LTRBF | EULIF / LTRBF | |
Capitalization | 77.1M | 66.7M | 116% |
EBITDA | -13.75M | -4.26M | 323% |
Gain YTD | 155.000 | 3.030 | 5,115% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 301K | 38.5K | 782% |
Total Debt | 844K | 3.75M | 23% |
EULIF | LTRBF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago25% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago25% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago20% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago10% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago8% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago72% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EULIF and LTRBF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EULIF and LTRBF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EULIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EULIF | 100% | +2.00% | ||
LTRBF - EULIF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ELMTF - EULIF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BTRMF - EULIF | 6% Poorly correlated | -54.86% | ||
METOF - EULIF | 5% Poorly correlated | -5.90% | ||
COPAF - EULIF | 3% Poorly correlated | +3.02% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LTRBF and NRVTF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTRBF and NRVTF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTRBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LTRBF | 100% | N/A | ||
NRVTF - LTRBF | 33% Poorly correlated | +9.69% | ||
ELMTF - LTRBF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
EULIF - LTRBF | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.00% | ||
SRKZF - LTRBF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MKRIF - LTRBF | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.69% | ||
More |