Advertisement
EUEMF vs FCLIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EUEMF is a Hold and FCLIF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EUEMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFCLIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EUEMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FCLIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EUEMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCLIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EUEMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FCLIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EUEMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FCLIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -14.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +7.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +26.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.92%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+7.98% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| EUEMF | FCLIF | EUEMF / FCLIF | |
| Capitalization | 5.76M | 28.3M | 20% |
| EBITDA | -1.14M | -2.14M | 53% |
| Gain YTD | -11.367 | -13.042 | 87% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 633K | - |
| Total Cash | 1.7M | 220K | 772% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 0 | - |
| EUEMF | FCLIF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 31% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 50% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
EUEMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EUEMF and FLMCF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EUEMF and FLMCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EUEMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUEMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FLMCF - EUEMF | 30% Poorly correlated | +26.08% | ||
| LBNKF - EUEMF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
| AZMTF - EUEMF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.76% | ||
| LITOF - EUEMF | 20% Poorly correlated | +6.63% | ||
| OMZNF - EUEMF | 20% Poorly correlated | +6.44% | ||
More | ||||
FCLIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FCLIF and LZM have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCLIF and LZM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCLIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCLIF | 100% | -8.84% | ||
| LZM - FCLIF | 10% Poorly correlated | +6.18% | ||
| VLTLF - FCLIF | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.23% | ||
| MLPNF - FCLIF | 7% Poorly correlated | +15.00% | ||
| USGO - FCLIF | 6% Poorly correlated | +6.22% | ||
| EUEMF - FCLIF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||