ETWO
Price
$3.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
1.03B
32 days until earnings call
PINC
Price
$25.84
Change
-$0.44 (-1.67%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.13B
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ETWO vs PINC

Header iconETWO vs PINC Comparison
Open Charts ETWO vs PINCBanner chart's image
E2open Parent Holdings
Price$3.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$26.64M
Capitalization1.03B
Premier
Price$25.84
Change-$0.44 (-1.67%)
Volume$50.14K
Capitalization2.13B
ETWO vs PINC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ETWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PINC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ETWO vs. PINC commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETWO is a StrongBuy and PINC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ETWO: $3.30 vs. PINC: $26.28)
Brand notoriety: ETWO and PINC are both not notable
ETWO represents the Packaged Software, while PINC is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ETWO: 172% vs. PINC: 69%
Market capitalization -- ETWO: $1.03B vs. PINC: $2.13B
ETWO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.03B. PINC’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $2.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $316.66B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $44.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.89B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ETWO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePINC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ETWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PINC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PINC is a better buy in the long-term than ETWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ETWO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PINC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ETWO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PINC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ETWO is a better buy in the short-term than PINC.

Price Growth

ETWO (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PINC (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was +0.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.93%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

ETWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 08, 2025.

PINC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.85% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Services to the Health Industry (-0.71% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PINC($2.13B) has a higher market cap than ETWO($1.03B). PINC YTD gains are higher at: 27.600 vs. ETWO (24.060). PINC has less debt than ETWO: PINC (283M) vs ETWO (1.06B).
ETWOPINCETWO / PINC
Capitalization1.03B2.13B48%
EBITDA-428.2MN/A-
Gain YTD24.06027.60087%
P/E RatioN/A38.01-
Revenue609MN/A-
Total Cash230MN/A-
Total Debt1.06B283M375%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PINC: Fundamental Ratings
PINC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETWOPINC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ETWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PINC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LKSCX22.960.38
+1.68%
LKCM Small Cap Equity Instl
PDSIX49.000.41
+0.84%
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index I
CGVHX27.000.17
+0.63%
American Funds Global Insight 529-F-3
SCREX35.970.21
+0.59%
Sterling Capital Rl Estt R6
GGKPX27.360.13
+0.48%
Goldman Sachs Income Builder P

ETWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ETWO has been closely correlated with NCCGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ETWO jumps, then NCCGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ETWO
1D Price
Change %
ETWO100%
N/A
NCCGF - ETWO
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
TXG - ETWO
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
UPBD - ETWO
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
MSFT - ETWO
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
EVCM - ETWO
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
More

PINC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINC has been loosely correlated with GDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINC jumps, then GDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PINC
1D Price
Change %
PINC100%
+2.70%
GDC - PINC
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.71%
ETWO - PINC
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DOX - PINC
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
LAW - PINC
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.19%
PGNY - PINC
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
More