Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETO vs HEQ
ETO vs HEQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETO vs. HEQ commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETO is a Buy and HEQ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ETO has more net assets: 537M vs. HEQ (152M). HEQ has a higher annual dividend yield than ETO: HEQ (3.814) vs ETO (-0.087). ETO was incepted earlier than HEQ: ETO (22 years) vs HEQ (15 years). ETO (1.15) and HEQ (1.20) have comparable expense ratios . HEQ has a higher turnover ETO (65.00) vs ETO (65.00).
| ETO | HEQ | ETO / HEQ | |
| Gain YTD | -0.087 | 3.814 | -2% |
| Net Assets | 537M | 152M | 353% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.20 | 96% |
| Turnover | 65.00 | 197.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 2.34 | 5.03 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ETO | HEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 7 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 79% | 16 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OSPAX | 9.76 | 0.14 | +1.46% |
| Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha R6 | |||
| SBSIX | 15.71 | 0.07 | +0.45% |
| Segall Bryant & Hamill Intl Sm Cp Ins | |||
| MINRX | 38.21 | 0.06 | +0.16% |
| MFS International Intrinsic Value R1 | |||
| JMNCX | 12.48 | -0.05 | -0.40% |
| JPMorgan Research Market Neutral C | |||
| QCACX | 44.51 | -0.55 | -1.22% |
| Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C | |||
ETO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ETO and AAPL have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ETO and AAPL's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ETO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETO | 100% | -1.15% | ||
| AAPL - ETO | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| NVDA - ETO | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.84% | ||
| MSFT - ETO | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.87% | ||
| GOOG - ETO | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.22% | ||
| AMZN - ETO | -1% Poorly correlated | -1.79% | ||
More | ||||
HEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HEQ and IBM have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HEQ and IBM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y