Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNMX vs RLBCX
ETNMX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts ETNMX vs RLBCX
Eventide Balanced Fund
Price$14.99
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets388.01M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.26
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.04B
ETNMX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNMX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNMX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. ETNMX (388M). ETNMX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: ETNMX (1.83) vs RLBCX (1.53). ETNMX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: ETNMX (10 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). ETNMX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX (44.00) and ETNMX (43.00) have comparable annual turnover. RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNMX: RLBCX (250) vs ETNMX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. ETNMX (4.11). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.60 vs. ETNMX (35.86).
| ETNMX | RLBCX | ETNMX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.89 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.943 | 12.918 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 388M | 262B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.53 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.11 | 7.77 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.75 | 50.08 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.86 | 42.60 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.11 | 79.23 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement