Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNHX vs FSPHX
ETNHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. ETNHX (1.53B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: ETNHX (13 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). ETNHX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). ETNHX (41.00) and FSPHX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FSPHX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). ETNHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.47 vs. FSPHX (-3.95). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -11.15 vs. ETNHX (-12.01).
| ETNHX | FSPHX | ETNHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.63 | 241% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.63 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.786 | 10.972 | 353% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 6.22B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.47 | -3.95 | -670% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.93 | 11.32 | 406% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.01 | -11.15 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.87 | 41.88 | 234% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers