Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNHX vs FSPHX
ETNHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. ETNHX (1.7B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FSPHX (0.01) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: ETNHX (13 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). ETNHX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). ETNHX (41.00) and FSPHX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FSPHX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). ETNHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.25 vs. FSPHX (-0.15). ETNHX return over 5 years is better than : -6.55 vs. FSPHX (-9.31).
| ETNHX | FSPHX | ETNHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.63 | 240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.63 | 240% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 58.102 | 12.550 | 463% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 6.67B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.25 | -0.15 | -31,705% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.70 | 8.78 | 635% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.55 | -9.31 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.44 | 43.45 | 286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement