Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNHX vs FSPHX
ETNHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. ETNHX (1.42B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: ETNHX (13 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). ETNHX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). ETNHX (41.00) and FSPHX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FSPHX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). ETNHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.42 vs. FSPHX (-9.25). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.08 vs. ETNHX (-13.91).
| ETNHX | FSPHX | ETNHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.63 | 241% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.63 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.606 | 5.358 | 553% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 5.96B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.42 | -9.25 | -167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.00 | 8.28 | 483% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.91 | -13.08 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.91 | 38.84 | 255% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers