Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNHX vs FSPHX
ETNHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. ETNHX (1.14B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: ETNHX (13 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). ETNHX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). ETNHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FSPHX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). ETNHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.25 vs. FSPHX (-9.98). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.46 vs. ETNHX (-22.82).
| ETNHX | FSPHX | ETNHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.63 | 241% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.63 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.218 | -5.798 | -38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 5.92B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.25 | -9.98 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.81 | -0.60 | -3,950% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.82 | -15.46 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.38 | 8.52 | 345% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement