Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNHX vs FSPHX
ETNHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. ETNHX (1.33B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: ETNHX (13 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). ETNHX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). ETNHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FSPHX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). ETNHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.67 vs. FSPHX (-15.27). ETNHX return over 5 years is better than : -6.55 vs. FSPHX (-13.54).
| ETNHX | FSPHX | ETNHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.63 | 241% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.63 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.951 | -1.982 | -1,158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 5.88B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.67 | -15.27 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.89 | 3.58 | 1,001% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.55 | -13.54 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.45 | 36.65 | 288% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers