Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNHX vs FSPHX
ETNHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. ETNHX (1.67B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FSPHX (0.43) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: ETNHX (13 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). ETNHX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). ETNHX (41.00) and FSPHX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FSPHX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). ETNHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.04 vs. FSPHX (0.29). ETNHX return over 5 years is better than : -4.82 vs. FSPHX (-13.13).
| ETNHX | FSPHX | ETNHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.63 | 240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.63 | 240% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.788 | 0.809 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 6.28B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.04 | 0.29 | 16,336% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.08 | 1.47 | 3,199% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.82 | -13.13 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 213.70 | 62.61 | 341% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement