Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNHX vs FBTAX
ETNHX vs FBTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FBTAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a Hold and FBTAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.87B vs. ETNHX (1.67B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FBTAX (1.17) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FBTAX: ETNHX (13 years) vs FBTAX (25 years). ETNHX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. ETNHX (41.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FBTAX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). ETNHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.04 vs. FBTAX (42.12). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.38 vs. ETNHX (-4.82).
| ETNHX | FBTAX | ETNHX / FBTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.96 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.96 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.788 | 2.751 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 1.87B | 90% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.04 | 42.12 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.08 | 60.53 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.82 | 12.38 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 213.70 | 122.13 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement