Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNHX vs FBTAX
ETNHX vs FBTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FBTAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a Hold and FBTAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.84B vs. ETNHX (1.66B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FBTAX (1.19) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FBTAX: ETNHX (13 years) vs FBTAX (25 years). ETNHX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. ETNHX (41.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FBTAX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). ETNHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.67 vs. FBTAX (44.47). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.33 vs. ETNHX (-5.36).
| ETNHX | FBTAX | ETNHX / FBTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.96 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.96 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.024 | -0.935 | -110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.66B | 1.84B | 90% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.67 | 44.47 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.19 | 55.20 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.36 | 11.33 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 181.75 | 87.25 | 208% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement