Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNHX vs FBTAX
ETNHX vs FBTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNHX vs. FBTAX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNHX is a Hold and FBTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. ETNHX (1.33B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than ETNHX: FBTAX (2.59) vs ETNHX (0.00). ETNHX was incepted earlier than FBTAX: ETNHX (13 years) vs FBTAX (25 years). ETNHX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX (73.00) and ETNHX (71.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNHX: FBTAX (0) vs ETNHX (1000). ETNHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.67 vs. FBTAX (0.34). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.85 vs. ETNHX (-6.55).
| ETNHX | FBTAX | ETNHX / FBTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.96 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.96 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.951 | 18.339 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 1.46B | 91% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.67 | 0.34 | 3,967% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.89 | 43.90 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.55 | 6.85 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.45 | 50.27 | 210% |