Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETCDX vs FSMDX
ETCDX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ETCDX vs FSMDX
Eventide Dividend Growth C
Price$19.63
Change-$0.20 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.16
Change-$0.29 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.87B
ETCDX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETCDX vs. FSMDX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETCDX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 46.9B vs. ETCDX (1.19B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ETCDX: FSMDX (1.07) vs ETCDX (0.00). ETCDX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ETCDX (8 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). ETCDX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ETCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETCDX: FSMDX (0) vs ETCDX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.33 vs. ETCDX (2.61). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.72 vs. ETCDX (39.79).
| ETCDX | FSMDX | ETCDX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.03 | 7,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.03 | 7,760% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.238 | 3.060 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 46.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.61 | 9.33 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.33 | 38.71 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.79 | 45.72 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 185.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement