Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETAHX vs FSPHX
ETAHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETAHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETAHX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. ETAHX (1.69B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than ETAHX: FSPHX (0.43) vs ETAHX (0.00). ETAHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: ETAHX (13 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). ETAHX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). ETAHX (41.00) and FSPHX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETAHX: FSPHX (0) vs ETAHX (1000). ETAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.96 vs. FSPHX (0.29). ETAHX return over 5 years is better than : -5.09 vs. FSPHX (-13.13).
| ETAHX | FSPHX | ETAHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.63 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.63 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.775 | 0.809 | 96% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 6.28B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.96 | 0.29 | 16,308% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.83 | 1.47 | 3,182% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.09 | -13.13 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 211.70 | 62.61 | 338% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement