Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETAHX vs FSPHX
ETAHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETAHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETAHX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. ETAHX (1.53B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than ETAHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs ETAHX (0.00). ETAHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: ETAHX (13 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). ETAHX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). ETAHX (41.00) and FSPHX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETAHX: FSPHX (0) vs ETAHX (1000). ETAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.98 vs. FSPHX (-5.87). ETAHX return over 5 years is better than : -10.52 vs. FSPHX (-12.12).
| ETAHX | FSPHX | ETAHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.63 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.63 | 249% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 41.491 | 9.761 | 425% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 6.22B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.98 | -5.87 | -477% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.75 | 8.94 | 512% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.52 | -12.12 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.81 | 41.27 | 242% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement