Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETAEX vs SCICX
ETAEX vs SCICX Comparison
Open Charts ETAEX vs SCICX
Eventide Exponential Technologies A
Price$14.20
Change-$0.03 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.9M
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info C
Price$61.37
Change-$0.30 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.31B
ETAEX vs SCICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETAEX vs. SCICX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETAEX is a Hold and SCICX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCICX has more cash in the bank: 18.3B vs. ETAEX (91.9M). ETAEX (0.00) and SCICX (0.00) have matching dividends . ETAEX was incepted earlier than SCICX: ETAEX (5 years) vs SCICX (26 years). SCICX (1.91) is less costly to investors than ETAEX (1.74). ETAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 126.00 vs. SCICX (33.00). ETAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCICX: ETAEX (1000) vs SCICX (2000). ETAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.82 vs. SCICX (5.03). SCICX return over 5 years is better than : 6.23 vs. ETAEX (3.50).
| ETAEX | SCICX | ETAEX / SCICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.91 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.928 | 33.675 | 21% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.9M | 18.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.82 | 5.03 | 314% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.34 | 39.76 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.50 | 6.23 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement