Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETAEX vs SCICX
ETAEX vs SCICX Comparison
Open Charts ETAEX vs SCICX
Eventide Exponential Technologies A
Price$14.04
Change-$0.67 (-4.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.8M
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info C
Price$61.72
Change-$2.93 (-4.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.38B
ETAEX vs SCICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETAEX vs. SCICX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETAEX is a Hold and SCICX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCICX has more cash in the bank: 18.4B vs. ETAEX (94.8M). ETAEX (0.00) and SCICX (0.00) have matching dividends . ETAEX was incepted earlier than SCICX: ETAEX (5 years) vs SCICX (26 years). SCICX (1.91) is less costly to investors than ETAEX (1.74). ETAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 126.00 vs. SCICX (33.00). ETAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCICX: ETAEX (1000) vs SCICX (2000). ETAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.93 vs. SCICX (6.14). SCICX return over 5 years is better than : 5.78 vs. ETAEX (4.00).
| ETAEX | SCICX | ETAEX / SCICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.91 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.723 | 40.819 | 14% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.8M | 18.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.93 | 6.14 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.52 | 29.69 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.00 | 5.78 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement