Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETAEX vs SCICX
ETAEX vs SCICX Comparison
Open Charts ETAEX vs SCICX
Eventide Exponential Technologies A
Price$14.29
Change+$0.08 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.88M
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info C
Price$53.50
Change+$0.59 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.79B
ETAEX vs SCICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETAEX vs. SCICX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETAEX is a Hold and SCICX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCICX has more cash in the bank: 19.8B vs. ETAEX (88.9M). ETAEX (0.00) and SCICX (0.00) have matching dividends . ETAEX was incepted earlier than SCICX: ETAEX (6 years) vs SCICX (27 years). SCICX (1.91) is less costly to investors than ETAEX (1.79). ETAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 126.00 vs. SCICX (33.00). ETAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCICX: ETAEX (1000) vs SCICX (2000). SCICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.78 vs. ETAEX (5.77). ETAEX return over 5 years is better than : -12.76 vs. SCICX (-14.47).
| ETAEX | SCICX | ETAEX / SCICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.91 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.91 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.970 | 8.806 | -11% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.9M | 19.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.77 | 14.78 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.60 | 28.57 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.76 | -14.47 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers