Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETAEX vs FSCSX
ETAEX vs FSCSX Comparison
Open Charts ETAEX vs FSCSX
Eventide Exponential Technologies A
Price$14.21
Change-$0.31 (-2.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.79M
Fidelity Select Software & IT Svcs Port
Price$23.81
Change-$0.60 (-2.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.41B
ETAEX vs FSCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETAEX vs. FSCSX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETAEX is a Hold and FSCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCSX has more cash in the bank: 9.41B vs. ETAEX (90.8M). ETAEX (0.00) and FSCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . ETAEX was incepted earlier than FSCSX: ETAEX (6 years) vs FSCSX (40 years). ETAEX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSCSX (0.62). ETAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 126.00 vs. FSCSX (14.00). FSCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETAEX: FSCSX (0) vs ETAEX (1000). ETAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.25 vs. FSCSX (-9.29). FSCSX return over 5 years is better than : -7.26 vs. ETAEX (-13.25).
| ETAEX | FSCSX | ETAEX / FSCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.62 | 258% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.62 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.525 | -3.250 | 47% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.8M | 9.41B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.25 | -9.29 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | 18.73 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.25 | -7.26 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 123.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement