ET
Price
$17.11
Change
-$0.29 (-1.67%)
Updated
Sep 8, 12:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
59.69B
51 days until earnings call
SMC
Price
$22.47
Change
-$0.57 (-2.47%)
Updated
Sep 8, 01:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
282.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ET vs SMC

Header iconET vs SMC Comparison
Open Charts ET vs SMCBanner chart's image
Energy Transfer
Price$17.11
Change-$0.29 (-1.67%)
Volume$2.4K
Capitalization59.69B
Summit Midstream
Price$22.47
Change-$0.57 (-2.47%)
Volume$100
Capitalization282.05M
ET vs SMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ET vs. SMC commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ET is a StrongBuy and SMC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ET: $17.39 vs. SMC: $23.04)
Brand notoriety: ET: Notable vs. SMC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ET: 94% vs. SMC: 89%
Market capitalization -- ET: $59.69B vs. SMC: $282.05M
ET [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $59.69B. SMC’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $282.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $105.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $11.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ET is a better buy in the long-term than SMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ET’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ET’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ET is a better buy in the short-term than SMC.

Price Growth

ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -1.86% price change this week, while SMC (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

ET is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.05% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ET($59.7B) has a higher market cap than SMC($282M). ET has higher P/E ratio than SMC: ET (13.48) vs SMC (5.74). ET YTD gains are higher at: -6.303 vs. SMC (-39.015). SMC has less debt than ET: SMC (1.08B) vs ET (61.6B).
ETSMCET / SMC
Capitalization59.7B282M21,170%
EBITDAN/A126M-
Gain YTD-6.303-39.01516%
P/E Ratio13.485.74235%
RevenueN/A482M-
Total CashN/A20.9M-
Total Debt61.6B1.08B5,730%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ET vs SMC: Fundamental Ratings
ET
SMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1354
SMR RATING
1..100
6198
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5686
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5032
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ET's Valuation (11) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMC (51). This means that ET’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMC’s over the last 12 months.

ET's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMC (54). This means that ET’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMC’s over the last 12 months.

ET's SMR Rating (61) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMC (98). This means that ET’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMC’s over the last 12 months.

ET's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as SMC (86). This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to SMC’s over the last 12 months.

SMC's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (50). This means that SMC’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETSMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NXTE35.880.91
+2.59%
AXS Green Alpha ETF
XPH47.850.57
+1.21%
SPDR® S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF
GWX39.440.37
+0.96%
SPDR® S&P® International Small Cap ETF
XLY235.11-0.05
-0.02%
The Consumer Discret Sel SectSPDR® ETF
ESN16.63-0.03
-0.18%
Essential 40 Stock ETF

ET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ET has been closely correlated with TRGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ET jumps, then TRGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ET
1D Price
Change %
ET100%
-1.47%
TRGP - ET
74%
Closely correlated
-2.52%
PAGP - ET
73%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
OKE - ET
73%
Closely correlated
-2.35%
PAA - ET
73%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
KNTK - ET
73%
Closely correlated
-1.73%
More

SMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMC has been loosely correlated with TRGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMC jumps, then TRGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMC
1D Price
Change %
SMC100%
-0.90%
TRGP - SMC
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
OKE - SMC
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.35%
ET - SMC
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
MPLX - SMC
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
PAA - SMC
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
More