ET
Price
$16.45
Change
-$0.23 (-1.38%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
56.47B
18 days until earnings call
NGL
Price
$6.04
Change
-$0.12 (-1.95%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
772.2M
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ET vs NGL

Header iconET vs NGL Comparison
Open Charts ET vs NGLBanner chart's image
Energy Transfer
Price$16.45
Change-$0.23 (-1.38%)
Volume$14.39M
Capitalization56.47B
NGL Energy Partners
Price$6.04
Change-$0.12 (-1.95%)
Volume$380.21K
Capitalization772.2M
ET vs NGL Comparison Chart in %
ET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ET vs. NGL commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ET is a Hold and NGL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ET: $16.45 vs. NGL: $6.04)
Brand notoriety: ET: Notable vs. NGL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ET: 115% vs. NGL: 65%
Market capitalization -- ET: $56.47B vs. NGL: $772.2M
ET [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $56.47B. NGL’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $772.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $102.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $11.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNGL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NGL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ET is a better buy in the long-term than NGL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ET’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NGL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NGL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ET is a better buy in the short-term than NGL.

Price Growth

ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.98% price change this week, while NGL (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

ET is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

NGL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.62% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ET($56.5B) has a higher market cap than NGL($772M). NGL YTD gains are higher at: 21.042 vs. ET (-11.367). ET has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.2B vs. NGL (611M). ET has more cash in the bank: 242M vs. NGL (5.44M). NGL has less debt than ET: NGL (3B) vs ET (61.6B). ET has higher revenues than NGL: ET (80.6B) vs NGL (3.33B).
ETNGLET / NGL
Capitalization56.5B772M7,319%
EBITDA15.2B611M2,488%
Gain YTD-11.36721.042-54%
P/E Ratio12.75N/A-
Revenue80.6B3.33B2,419%
Total Cash242M5.44M4,448%
Total Debt61.6B3B2,055%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ET vs NGL: Fundamental Ratings
ET
NGL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
565
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1452
SMR RATING
1..100
6095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5877
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ET's Valuation (8) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as NGL (17). This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to NGL’s over the last 12 months.

ET's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NGL (52). This means that ET’s stock grew somewhat faster than NGL’s over the last 12 months.

ET's SMR Rating (60) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NGL (95). This means that ET’s stock grew somewhat faster than NGL’s over the last 12 months.

NGL's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (59). This means that NGL’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

ET's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as NGL (77). This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to NGL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETNGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JRE24.770.23
+0.94%
Janus Henderson US Real Estate ETF
RWL110.500.76
+0.69%
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
PBSE28.900.10
+0.33%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Sep
GJUL40.420.13
+0.32%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Jul
XTWO49.65-0.03
-0.06%
BondBloxx Bloomberg Two YrTrgDurUSTrsETF

ET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ET has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ET jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ET
1D Price
Change %
ET100%
-1.38%
OKE - ET
73%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
PAGP - ET
73%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
PAA - ET
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
TRGP - ET
73%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
MPLX - ET
71%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
More

NGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NGL has been loosely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NGL jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NGL
1D Price
Change %
NGL100%
-1.95%
PAA - NGL
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PAGP - NGL
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
HESM - NGL
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
ET - NGL
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
EPD - NGL
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
More