ET
Price
$16.71
Change
+$0.12 (+0.72%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
57.37B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GBNXF
Price
$18.97
Change
+$0.53 (+2.87%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.11B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ET vs GBNXF

Header iconET vs GBNXF Comparison
Open Charts ET vs GBNXFBanner chart's image
Energy Transfer
Price$16.71
Change+$0.12 (+0.72%)
Volume$12.13M
Capitalization57.37B
Gibson Energy
Price$18.97
Change+$0.53 (+2.87%)
Volume$158.31K
Capitalization3.11B
ET vs GBNXF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ET vs. GBNXF commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ET is a StrongBuy and GBNXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ET: $16.57 vs. GBNXF: $18.23)
Brand notoriety: ET: Notable vs. GBNXF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ET: 57% vs. GBNXF: 37%
Market capitalization -- ET: $57.37B vs. GBNXF: $3.11B
ET [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $57.37B. GBNXF’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $3.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $104.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGBNXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GBNXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBNXF is a better buy in the long-term than ET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ET’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBNXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ET’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GBNXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ET is a better buy in the short-term than GBNXF.

Price Growth

ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +1.84% price change this week, while GBNXF (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

ET is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.87% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ET($57.4B) has a higher market cap than GBNXF($3.11B). GBNXF has higher P/E ratio than ET: GBNXF (28.81) vs ET (13.37). GBNXF YTD gains are higher at: 6.933 vs. ET (-8.926). ET has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.2B vs. GBNXF (536M). GBNXF has less debt than ET: GBNXF (2.76B) vs ET (61.6B). ET has higher revenues than GBNXF: ET (79.8B) vs GBNXF (10.8B).
ETGBNXFET / GBNXF
Capitalization57.4B3.11B1,843%
EBITDA15.2B536M2,836%
Gain YTD-8.9266.933-129%
P/E Ratio13.3728.8146%
Revenue79.8B10.8B739%
Total CashN/A41.6M-
Total Debt61.6B2.76B2,232%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ET vs GBNXF: Fundamental Ratings
ET
GBNXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1273
SMR RATING
1..100
10049
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5113
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ET's Valuation (11) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GBNXF (18) in the null industry. This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to GBNXF’s over the last 12 months.

ET's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBNXF (73) in the null industry. This means that ET’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBNXF’s over the last 12 months.

GBNXF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ET (100) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GBNXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ET’s over the last 12 months.

GBNXF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as ET (59) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GBNXF’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

GBNXF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ET (51) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GBNXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETGBNXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GBNXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBB29.760.58
+1.98%
CYBER HORNET S&P500 Bitcoin 75/25StgyETF
IOO126.990.45
+0.35%
iShares Global 100 ETF
ONOF37.850.11
+0.30%
Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF
WIW8.750.01
+0.11%
Western Asset Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
TSL17.72-0.07
-0.37%
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF

ET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ET has been closely correlated with PAGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ET jumps, then PAGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ET
1D Price
Change %
ET100%
-1.54%
PAGP - ET
73%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
OKE - ET
72%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
WES - ET
72%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
PAA - ET
71%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
TRGP - ET
71%
Closely correlated
-2.76%
More

GBNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBNXF has been loosely correlated with EPD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBNXF jumps, then EPD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBNXF
1D Price
Change %
GBNXF100%
N/A
EPD - GBNXF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
WMB - GBNXF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
OKE - GBNXF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
ET - GBNXF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
KMI - GBNXF
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
More